https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38881
--- Comment #15 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- Khaled thanks for your responses. Apologies if my comment / concern was unfounded. (In reply to comment #13) > You will be surprised to know that our own OpenSymbol font uses PUA for > characters *already* in Unicode. Well, perhaps disappointed rather than surprised ;) Not ideal, but the PUA is available to include anything so I guess not awful either. > those glyphs are not assigned any code points at all and are internal to the > fonts. I wasn't as clear as I could have been. I was worried these additional characters at the large hexadecimal offset were the required symbols. I see now they appear to be scaled variants of existing (encoded) glyphs. At least that is what they look like to me. Thanks again and sorry for the noise. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
