https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61727

--- Comment #5 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 89248
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=89248&action=edit
Screenshots showing rendering in LOv4132 and Word Mac 2011.

Some clarifying details for this bug. The file provided in comment #2 was
created in MS Word 2007 (docProps/app.xml indicates v12.0). On a Core i7 Q720 @
1.60GHz under Crunchbang 11 linux running v4.1.3.2 it takes about 1min 10sec to
open but does open OK. On a Core 2 Duo P8700 @ 2.53GHz under MacOS 10.6.8
running Word Mac 2011 it takes about half that time. Under the LO version
indicated the pagination is different, so the images exhibiting the problem can
be found on pp.140-150, instead of the page numbers indicated in comments 2 and
4.

Unfortunately the inserted graphics are so large that I cannot even attach an
extract from the original document. In order to simplify dealing with a large
document containing many images I am only going to use pp.141-144, opened under
LO (pp.130-133 in the original document as shown under Word 2011), as an
illustration. Screenshots of what these pages appear like (left/right placement
differs) under LO and Word 2011 are attached. 

The exhibited problem (there appears to be more than one, but I will just deal
with the rotation one as reported here) is that in LO the rotated images are
not displayed correctly i.e., the right way up. I think the reporter is also
trying to indicate that this depends upon whether the images in the original
document are singular or grouped (2, 3, or 4) after/prior(?) to being rotated.
Basically, LO does not appear to be supporting rotation of images (raster)
performed in Word 2007 and saved using the DOCX file format. Example PDF to
follow in subsequent comment.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to