https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44424
tommy27 <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #7 from tommy27 <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #0) > - RTF-Document of 3 pages > - In print dialogue: > -- pages to print: "1 3" > -- no. of prints per page: "2" > Result: > - Page 1 was printed 4 times > - Page 3 was printed 2 times not reproducible under Win7 64bit using LibO 4.1.4.2 "1 3" print and no. of prints per page "2" --> each page (1, 2 and 3) is printed in 2 copies I mark this as RESOLVED WORKSFORME (In reply to comment #6) > I personally would expect that if you write "1 3", this would be rejected. > The correct syntax for me would be "1 - 3" for printing page 1 to 3 and "1, > 3" for printing page 1 and 3. I agree. I don't like at all the "1 3" syntax too.... one should use "1 - 3" or "1,3" as pointed out by A. Does anybody know how MS Word deals with such a scenario? is the "1 3" syntax accepted or not? maybe we should open a separate report for this. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
