https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68123
--- Comment #2 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #0) > The Bibliography tool gives misleading examples, making how to use it > confusing. > > The specific problem is with the "Identifier" field. In the entry form this > is called the "Short Name." The first problem is that the field needs to be > named consistently. > > The second problem is that the example entries for the field are > nonsensical. Although you wouldn't know it from the names, the field is > actually the form that the citation should take within the text -- for > example, (Smith: 1997) in the APA style. The nonsensical examples should be > replaced with one that will actually indicate the purpose of the field, such > as In-Text Citation. Seems like it would be a good idea to keep the documentation team informed of any changes made in this respect. I do not know what the standard method of doing this is, otherwise I would make the change. Is the Documentation ML added as a CC? > 2.) The ability to chose the database for major citation styles (APA, MLA, > Chicago). There is a point and screenshot, that seems related to this exact issue, noted for the FOSEM 2014 UX hackfest: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Hackfest/FOSDEM2014#Ideas Thanks are due to Fabian for pointing this out in bug 73275. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
