https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77018
Dominique Boutry <dominique.bout...@laposte.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Dominique Boutry <dominique.bout...@laposte.net> ---
Hi. Reproduced (same LibO version, same OS)
It looks like an attempt to maintain the moved cell taking into account the
move during the sort. Eg: "M Advertizing", previously referencing AR403, moves
from row 12 to row 24 after the sort and then references AR391 (391 = 403 -
(24-12)). Wrong for 2 reasons :
- the reference to cell "=file...AR403", even typed without the "$", have no
relative position to cell in an other file,
- it seemed to me agreed that cells moved by a "sort" have not their references
updated (contrary to explicit moves).
An other view on unclear situation after a move :
- before the sort, fill C12 with "=C34", copy C12 to C13:C24,
- look at the content of C12:C24 after the sort : inexplicably unchanged,
despite it was in the selected area to be sorted.
IMHO there are no more BUGS related to the sort feature, there is rather an
OBSCUR and FLUCTUATING specification.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
