https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79206
--- Comment #4 from [email protected] --- @jay I can't get your example to work 'correctly' on Win or Mint, ie putting the insertion point anywhere in the middle of your example and typing a space without subsequently moving the insertion point leaves the second part without the miss-spleeing underline. Agree that Win is worse than Mint in that in Win you can move the insertion point anywhere without the misspelling underline for the second half of a split word reappearing. Inserting any character into the document corrects the previous missing underline. In Mint, you can move the insertion point anywhere within a miss-spelt word without the underline appearing, but moving it outside the word corrects the missing underline. Moving it into the miss-spelt and non-underlined word does not correct the missing underline. Here's another example (using Mint Qiana on a 32 bit PC): type a new line with a following space queue -> no underline - correct delete first u qeue -> no underline until click outside word click outside word to get underline, then replace missing u queue -> underline immediately dissapears This is inconsistent behaviour. Thus, for me, this is an almost identical bug in both Linux and Win. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
