https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54393
Owen Genat <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|REOPENED |NEW Severity|normal |enhancement Priority|highest |medium Version|4.2.5.2 release |3.6.1.2 release --- Comment #5 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- Werner, you have my sympathy with this report. I use this form of referencing rarely, but I am well aware of the need. Thanks for including the link to the mailing list discussion. I am surprised that there was not greater recognition that different referencing systems (APA, CMS, Vancouver, et al.) handle the various elements differently. I notice a number of fields related to this bug have been erroneous altered over time, so I am going to try and set them more correctly: - Status set to NEW as I am confirming this bug. The history indicates it was previously set from NEEDINFO to REOPENED, when it should have been set back UNCONFIRMED. - Version set back to v3.6.1.2. This field indicates the earliest release the problem applies to. In this case this feature has never been available and so goes right back to OOo, however QA use this field differently for enhancements (to track versions that enhancements apply to). - Importance set to medium as this bug "prevents users from making professional quality work". Refer the flowchart under Step 6: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/BugTriage - Severity set to enhancement as this is requesting a new feature that has never existed before. Best wishes with getting this feature implemented. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
