https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80054
--- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> --- Adolfo, (In reply to comment #6) > I said niche OPTIONS, not niche COLORS. Design is trying to remove > superflous options to reduce complexity, and IMHO adding a color chooser for > non-printing characters is one such superflous setting. If it’s so > desperately wanted, it could live buried in Expert Config. Actually, I'd probably disagree with that, because as a reasonable UX customization that has gained Design team approval, setting a custom color from the Appearance panel is a very logical implementation. Additionally as Expert Config remains a horrible hack at this point--it is really not functional at all for efficiency of UI configuration. Especially a joy if you happen to be using AT. IMHO the Tools -> Options -> Appearance -> Custom Colors remains the most direct and efficient way to implement assignment of alternate color to the NON_PRINTING_CHARACTER_COLOR RGB_COLORDATA as manipulating RGB color assignment to variables either directly or more often via enum lists is how this aspect of the UI is customized, see svtools/colorcfg. Implementing remaining facet of this issue probably rates an easy-hack designation. But if combined with the automated adjustment of bug 78381, and a need to handle display of NPC in modules other than writer it becomes a more substantial development effort. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
