https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=81168
--- Comment #4 from Jacobo Aragunde Pérez <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #1) > And what is the effect of not having any names? Do AT (as opposed to > accessible event listeners) still report the presence of the frame or do > they use the absence of a name as an unwritten convention for objects that > don't need to be reported (like empty alt attributes on images in HTML4.x > and XHTML 1.x)? > I've checked what Orca does, it says "Frame1 text frame activated" when I focus it, as you can see the role already tells us we are dealing with a text frame. I don't think it ignores objects with empty names, as a matter of fact most objects like paragraphs don't have it. > Anyway, the current behaviour is that LibreOffice always fills in the > frame's name (attribute draw:name); when you delete the name and save the > file, then reopen the frame options, you will find that LibreOffice has > filled in a name. > That's right. As additional info, at right click -> description you can enter a title that will be used as the accessible name of the object, ignoring the name found at right click -> frame -> options. > Is there a better way of dealing with this issue than removing the > placeholder names? I am thinking specifically of prompting the user to > provide a meaningful name when inserting a frame. This would also be useful > for many other types of objects. The description dialog would be a great candidate for this but I fear that prompting the user for a title every time a frame is inserted would be too intrusive. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
