https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82241
--- Comment #3 from Markus Mohrhard <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #2) > (In reply to comment #1) > > @Winfried: > > You already worked in that area, would you like to take a look at this? > > It looks as if this is a sort of duplicate of bug 80058, which Markus > Mohrhard fixed in master. > > Only the fix is limited to dots in function names. > Also, my work tried to work for all locales, without knowing what special > characters may be used in function names. Markus's fix may miss more > characters than '_'. > > I don't know if my concern is justified and I don't know if Markus would > like to expand his fix himself: > -should the method I used for bug 75264 be used to fix this bug as well, or > can the fix for bug 80058 simply be expanded? > -I can try both options, but may not be able to do so within a day. > -I probably leave cherry-picking for 4.3 to others. You can't use the fix for bug 75264 as the problem is about the editeng selection not being correct and that one needs either a fix down in the break iterator code or my hack needs just addition for the few additional characters. My fix just checks if the currently selected part of the word already starts with the replacement text or not and otherwise goes to the beginning of the next word and extends the selection. Adding the support for _ is not a problem. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
