https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=82309
Adolfo Jayme <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |NEEDINFO --- Comment #5 from Adolfo Jayme <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #3) > I personally am happy with small icons, but this bug is about what's best > for regular/new users, and of course those who like small have the option to > change it to small icons in the options dialog. As most users never change > the default settings, its always best to have the most optimal choice > already set out for them. You say it's "optimal" based on one twitter complainer? > I think libreoffice's Sifr icons have a good icon metaphor if they were set > by default, but unfortunately they arent. By default, libreoffice uses Tango > and and unfortunately some of these tango icons aren't well designed, which > is why i believe a number of them were changed in 4.3. Those changes were made well before 4.3, in a "Tango Testing" theme, FTR. See also Astron's and Miroslav's GitHub accounts. > [...] But whether or not you have a good icon metaphor, it becomes harder > to correctly represent it when you have to design a small 16x16 icon It's certainly not impossible. Really, somebody explain why we need to switch to an oversized and even more cluttered default configuration. I wouldn't mind making *some* icons bigger, in order to highlight them, but not everything! There was a GSoC proposal to code this, why not wait for it? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
