https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=80346
Owen Genat <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #12 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- (In reply to comment #11) > Well they both are the same font with different names, so only one would > have had to be included. :) I would advocate for Noto Sans over Source Han Sans because of the smaller and more locale-friendly packaging of the OTF files. The Source Han Sans OTF files are larger, presumably due to locale combining. This (like my prior comment) is merely a pragmatic concern. > I think that would be great for users who come libreoffice's website to > download it. I think an even better idea would be that an infobar appears > the first time a CJK user opens libreoffice after an upgrade/install if they > dont have the fonts and suggests a means for them to download it Agreed. I think at this point in the discussion (given Noto Sans / Source Hans Sans) that this report can be confirmed. Whether and how a solution is implemented remains for developers / l10n experts to determine. Some interesting and worthwhile options have been presented in the discussion IMO. Status set to NEW. For clarity, bug 80538 contains details about the infobar, although this may not need to be added to the See Also list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
