https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83276
[email protected] changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Priority|medium |high --- Comment #3 from [email protected] --- (In reply to comment #2) > So, this new behavior itself, of updating references on sort, is > intentional, not a regression. Having said that, there is a request for > making it configurable. I do not see how the behaviour can be considered intentional given the mess it creates in the formulae. You start with a column of formulae which are (relatively speaking) the same; add extras rows and you can copy any formula to the additional rows. Once the data is sorted, the column of formulae are different. The more you sort, the worse the mess. Were it not for the fact that the formula in each row checks whether the lists needs re-sorting, I would have not noticed the mess made of the formulae. As it is, after each sort, I have to copy a "good" formula to all the remaining rows. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
