https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79892
--- Comment #35 from Owen Genat <[email protected]> --- Testing attachment 106629 for hard re-calc with these options: A - Enable regex in formula. OpenCL off (default settings). B - Disable regex in formula. OpenCL off. C - Enable regex in formula. OpenCL on (Internal, software interpreter). D - Disable regex in formula. OpenCL on (Internal, software interpreter). Under Crunchbang 11 x86_64 using v4.3.2.2 on Core i7 Q720 @ 1.60Ghz: A ~27 sec B ~27 sec C ~1 sec D ~1 sec Under Crunchbang 11 x86_64 using v4.4.0.0 2014-09-25 on Core i7 Q720 @ 1.60Ghz: A ~25 sec B ~25 sec C ~1 sec D ~1 sec (In reply to comment #7) > Doesn't matter if "Enable regular expressions in formulas" is activated or > not. Confirmed (mainly for my own curiosity). The performance under GNU/Linux (25-29 sec) appears to be better than under Windows (59 sec), so maybe there is something different in the Windows build with ICU? (In reply to comment #33) > m.a.riosv points out that we use: > > b73baa6fbdfef197608d1f69300919b9-icu4c-53_1-src.tgz > > and AOO uses: > > 2f6ecca935948f7db92d925d88d0d078-icu4c-4_0_1-src.tgz > > Its unclear to me how these versions really compare; perhaps something lies > within ? Michael, is there anything someone, such as myself (moderate CLI knowledge), can assist with in terms of trying to determine differences between these two ICU versions. One is twice the size of the other, no doubt due to the expansion of Unicode from 2009-2014. Even icu/source/test/testdata/regextst.txt highlights numerous differences. Would raising the matter on the Unicode mailing list help pinpoint an area to look at? Best wishes, Owen. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
