https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84315

--- Comment #24 from Lionel Elie Mamane <[email protected]> ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Sorry, I was probably not clear enough in my first comment. :-/
> 
> (In reply to comment #22)
> > So we should change the dlopen() mechanism in the mergedlibs case
> 
> Ideally we would just kill this dlopen.

That's a good plan for master, and WiP is at
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/11737

*But* I wouldn't do that in the stable branch... Additionally to timing issues
(that is, when will the full "kill the dlopen()" be done?), it is a rather
bigger change, and instead of making many changes everywhere, I'd rather the
dlopen mechanism (that is, the whole svx/dbtoolsclient) just didn't do the
dlopen(); that's *one* change in *one* place, "neutering" the mechanism instead
of killing it (that is, essentally making it a no-op instead of changing every
place that calls it to not call it).

>> Is there an "#ifdef" we can do to detect mergedlibs case?

> git grep CUI_DLL_NAME vcl/ shows

> -DCUI_DLL_NAME=\"$(call gb_Library_get_runtime_filename,$(call
> gb_Library__get_name,cui))\" \

> in makefile, and you can then use in source CUI_DLL_NAME instead of just
> "cui" without any #ifdefs
> It expands to the exact platform specific name, so no need for SVLIBRARY
> then.

You mean "$(call gb_Library__get_name,cui)" will expand to "mergedlib" (or
something like that) in the --enable-mergedlib case?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to