https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84714
--- Comment #3 from Regina Henschel <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #1) > I agree that in the meantime, we should not write table:table as a child of > draw:custom-shape, e.g. we could write loext:table instead, till the > proposal is accepted. How does that sound? I have ask in AOO-dev. There is no strong preference for one solution. Armins answer from a development point of view might be interesting for you. http://markmail.org/message/dimqg5pktyngizjg -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
