https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85403

Terrence Enger <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #3 from Terrence Enger <[email protected]> ---
Created attachment 108424
  --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=108424&action=edit
detailed results of two bibisect runs

I am relegating the detailed bibisect output to an attachment because
it is long enough to be an annoyance for people wanting to skip over
it.

Whoops.  I did my bibisecting working across the worksheet instead of
down like Caolán did.  Silly me!


I have done a couple of bibisects in the 43-all repository to
distinguish the following results:

(1) After menu option Data > "Text to Columns", A2 shows 123; and
    after I type =SUM(A1) in C1, it shows value 123.  This result is
    "good".

(2) After menu option Data > "Text to Columns", A2 shows 0; and after
    I type =sum(a1) in C1, it shows value 0.  I deemed this "bad" in
    the first bibisect, just to see where it started happening; and I
    deemed it "good" in the second bibisect to find the start of the
    reported behaviour.

(3) After menu option Data > "Text to Columns", A2 shows 0; and after
    I type =sum(a1) in C1, it shows value 123.  This is the reported
    behaviour, and I deemed it "bad".

Additionally, I deemed the following behaviours "skip":

(4) Menu option Data > "Text to Columns", instead of displaying the
    expected dialog, pegged the CPU until I ended the program with
    <Ctrl>+C.  The long string of consecutive skips in the first
    bibisect are this failure.

(5) Execution of LibreOffice ends with message "ERROR 4 forking
    process" in the terminal.  All the skips in the second bibisect
    are this failure.

To summarize from the detailed output:  When condition (2) is deemed
bad, bisect reports 21 possible first bad commits.  When condition (2)
is deemed good, there are only two possibles:

    # possible first bad commit: [5c95a5c8caeeb347ef97f337a237d66c35261710]
source-hash-a6d89e17995987549db36695f3ea490a18f30ba4
    # possible first bad commit: [ccbf29a52688534e5b3af5041c87e6eec9021a39]
source-hash-97c62ed88419f7288ce1b365474c65038253608e

and the last-encountered good commit is

    # good: [82c920939b3518277ba70c800018130ea9b027e7]
source-hash-8f0ecf253531963144d3d1c9ee5c12a6cda99c4e

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to