https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68930
Robinson Tryon (qubit) <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |[email protected] Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Philipp Weissenbacher from comment #1) > I think you mean BIN2DEC(). As documented here it takes 10 digits > (https://help.libreoffice.org/Calc/Add-in_Functions, > _List_of_Analysis_Functions_Part_One#BIN2DEC). > > This is due to the fact that SCA_MAXPLACES is set to 10 (see > http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/scaddins/source/analysis/analysis. > cxx#SCA_MAXPLACES). > > No idea whether we can raise that limit to SAL_MAX_INT32. It sounds like 1) This is a pretty straightforward improvement to the codebase 2) There's no clearcut reason why we wouldn't want to increase the bound I'll toss it in NEW for now. If a dev has a good explanation about why we can't/shouldn't bother with this one, please feel free to RESOLVE it appropriately. Thanks! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
