https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70408

Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |RESOLVED
           See Also|                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=68167,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=54772,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=38093,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=38262,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=47746,
                   |                            |https://bugs.freedesktop.or
                   |                            |g/show_bug.cgi?id=45610,
                   |                            |https://issues.apache.org/o
                   |                            |oo/show_bug.cgi?id=3959,
                   |                            |https://issues.apache.org/o
                   |                            |oo/show_bug.cgi?id=56924
         Resolution|---                         |DUPLICATE

--- Comment #10 from Mike Kaganski <[email protected]> ---
i#3959 has 11 dupes; there are so many similar requests for LO, too.

While this one MAY contain some additional details, it is more important for
reporters to make their main goal (here, a decent outliner functionality) more
visible. That is achieved using duplicates mechanism: if a request has many
dupes, it (among other things) indicates relative importance of the request. It
becomes more visible; chances are that it will find its implementor.

When there will be some initial effort to improve the status quo, it will be
the time to file new reports on specific deficiencies.

Having this in mind, I close this as duplicate of Bug 68167 again. Also, I list
some related requests in See Also section for reference.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 68167 ***

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to