https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87119

--- Comment #6 from Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]> ---
This commit (on master) might fix this problem, but I am not able to test
because of some unrelated bug:

commit 6eb155dea00a1e312fdc3339406bf168a93a25e7
Author: Tor Lillqvist <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue Dec 9 12:45:41 2014 +0200

    Don't use of the broken "Software" group interpreter

    FormulaGroupInterpreterSoftware is known to be broken, says moggi. We
should
    not use it as a fallback to OpenCL.

    Not sure whether it makes sense, but let's keep it in the code for now. 
Make
    using it conditional on setting the environment variable
    SC_ALLOW_BROKEN_SOFTWARE_INTERPRETER (to any value). Only a developer who
    wants to work on it should set that.

    sc::FormulaGroupInterpreter::getStatic() can now return NULL, adapt callers
    accordingly.

    This might fix fdo#87119, but I am not able to check, as the document from
    that bug causes an unrelated assertion for me.

    Change-Id: I24454f46332014cbcbf696252059b9743f3c84d6

 sc/source/core/data/formulacell.cxx  |  4 +++-
 sc/source/core/tool/formulagroup.cxx |  7 +++++--
 sc/source/core/tool/interpr5.cxx     | 12 ++++++++----
 3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to