https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87621
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- @Jay, Yes this would probably improve UX to split transition types from sub-types into a dropdown. The transition types and sub-types are defined in http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/offapi/com/sun/star/animations/TransitionType.idl http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/offapi/com/sun/star/animations/TransitionSubType.idl And against those we have http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/slideshow/source/engine/transitions/transitionfactorytab.cxx http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/slideshow/source/engine/transitions/slidetransitionfactory.cxx With a smattering of UI/XCU and XML definitions. Unfortunately, looking at transitionfactorytab.cxx, we merge both the Transition type and sub-type when defining the transition effect--calling against that listing. So while they can be identified in the list, a number of transitions in the list are not implemented and indexing could be painful. So, not sure they can be efficiently split into a type and a sub-type for a listbox and dropdown UI widgets. Getting it done would depend on how much work it requires. Still I think it is a good UI enhancement. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
