https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79892

Jay Philips <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
            Version|4.0.6.2 release             |4.0.0.0 beta1
            Summary|Performance regression for  |Performance regression
                   |the attached file, from     |between 3.6 and later
                   |3.6.2 to 4.0.6 up to        |version, triple time to do
                   |master, triple time to do   |the calculations (win only)
                   |the calculations (win only) |
         Whiteboard|perf                        |perf bibisectRequest

--- Comment #41 from Jay Philips <[email protected]> ---
Well i went and tested 4.0.0.3 and 4.0.0 beta1 and the refresh of calculation
of attachment 100853 is 1 minute, so hopefully that shrinks down the search
area.

Added bibisect request as Michael suggested it in comment 33.

(In reply to Michael Meeks from comment #40)
> I can't see us downgrading ICU really. Beyond that if someone wants to
> investigate that - they need to generate a matched pair of callgrind traces
> for the same workload (with symbols) for the older (faster) version, and the
> newer (slower) version - and see if indeed the problem is with ICU. If so,
> we then would want to write a micro-benchmark of that, and report to the ICU
> people and/or look at exactly what is wrong here.

As i supplied the callgrind for the newer version already, do you want me to do
the same for 3.6.2 and if so, where can i find a 3.6.2 version with symbols?
Would grabbing the LO 3.6 PPA (
https://launchpad.net/~libreoffice/+archive/ubuntu/libreoffice-3-6 ) and
installing the dbg package be enough?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to