https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65830
--- Comment #42 from Lionel Elie Mamane <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Beluga from comment #41) > (In reply to Lionel Elie Mamane from comment #40) >> Also, it seems unusual to me that the >> "Setup = " line maps to unixodbc's libodbcinst.so instead of a myodbc .so >> file; my entry has "Setup=libodbcmyS.so"; that's on Debian GNU/Linux FWIW. > I don't have any libodbcmyS.so in /usr/lib64 or anywhere in this system. The name confused me... On my system libodbcmyS.so is part of unixodbc, not myodbc, so I was wrong, and this part of your setup is plausible. >> This sounds like LibreOffice is compiled for a different libodbc than what >> you have... Usually, when the .so has a different name, it means it is an >> incompatible version, and simply linking one to the other WILL NOT WORK (or >> can seem to work, but lead to crashes, data corruption, etc). > I found this: http://www.unixodbc.org/ > 28.Nov.2011 2.3.1 Released > Mainly bug fixes. > Major change is to change the library version number from 1 to 2 to signal > the SQLLEN change for 64 land. Should have been done for 2.3.0, but better > late than never. So if after installing you have apps that can't find > libodbc.so, its likely they are linked to libodbc.so.1, so just create a > symlink from libodbc.so.2 > ---------- > Based on that official suggestion to symlink, there seems to be no danger. OK. <shrug> -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
