https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86329
Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] --- Comment #11 from Michael Weghorn <[email protected]> --- Would it not - in general - be a good idea to use the Linux dbgutil Bibisect repo (that contains newer versions than the other Bibisect repositories, s. https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/HowToBibisect#Testing_Versions) to bibisect bugs that cannot be bibisected with the "standard" Bibisect repos because the bugs are too new? Or is this repository not reliable enough? (It is marked as "for testing purposes only.") -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
