https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89321
A (Andy) <stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from A (Andy) <stgohi-lob...@yahoo.de> ---
I agree that some aspects can be improved.
>From my point of view most of the fields are necessary, but not the field
"Hardware", because I think most users (that are no IT specialists) do not know
what to select there.
I also agree that the naming in the "Component" field is not consistent as
described by the Bug Reporter. Maybe this list can also cleaned up or/and more
information is provided to understand what is for instance ci-infra, contrib,
framework, graphics stack, Linguistic, sdk, ux-advise?
Concerning the Enhancement issue I would also agree with the Bug Reporter. I
see again and again bug reports, where the user probably did not know that the
differentation of a normal bug and an enhancement request can be found in the
"Severity" field, because this is not intuitive. This should be clearer.
The field "Version" is from my point of view ok. I do not know if this can be
further improved.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
