https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89323
Matthew Francis <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |[email protected] Whiteboard|bibisectRequest |bibisected --- Comment #3 from Matthew Francis <[email protected]> --- @raal: Could you clarify exactly what you reproduced and how? I can't reproduce a crash on Linux, but I can reproduce the following issue: 1. Create a new presentation 2. Type a few characters of text into the slide body 3. Insert a table 4. Type a few characters into a table cell Result: - Actions are present in the undo stack for the body text insertion (2) / table text insertion (4), but not for the table insertion itself (3) In the 43all bibisect tree, before # possible first bad commit: [a0f20bc04a32a7791ba765d2de2f44f1b74033d1] source-hash-1de66ba440855050a794b3b2a8647c1b02c210b8 # possible first bad commit: [6848bca2a871fce1f3f28a8471eab4e5888ac9c9] source-hash-b45876bf0f2eeafba0a4f9f8f30cd4279eb2aa3e the table insertion gets an undo stack entry, but it is wrongly ordered (before the slide body text insertion rather than after). The original issue of the wrongly ordered undo stack insertion is inherited from OOo (exists in OOo 3.3.0) On the assumption that this is all the same issue, tagging this as bibisected for now - the above is at least a worsening of the original bug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
