https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72971
--- Comment #16 from Hal <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Joel Madero from comment #13) > @Hal - unlikely to be any time soon. > > http://joelmadero.wordpress.com/2014/10/11/user-expectations-and-the-reality- > of-our-community/ > > Options: > 1) Submit a patch yourself; > 2) Find a friend, family member, etc... to submit a patch; > 3) Pay for a fix; > 4) Wait patiently until a volunteer chooses to fix it. Joel - Thank you for your comments and link. I appreciate your input. I would gladly help, but I would have to learn the source code scheme (algorithms, etc.) currently used in 4.4.0.3. I would also have to learn the programming language used. Being an obsolete software/hardware guy I would end up spinning my wheels and likely end up with no improvement to the source code. I guess I'll have to wait for someone with the ability and inclination to fix the bug. However, I do suggest a cautionary note be added to the user manual informing prospective users that indexing using the [chapternumber.pagenumber] scheme does not work. A cautionary note might save someone a lot of wasted time. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
