https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90110

Matthew Francis <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |bisected, regression
                 CC|                            |[email protected],
                   |                            |[email protected]
            Version|unspecified                 |4.3.5.2 release
         Whiteboard|                            |bibisected

--- Comment #3 from Matthew Francis <[email protected]> ---
Bibisect results from 43all

5193ebac92810823540db2b5cf24d33db5ef489c is the first bad commit
commit 5193ebac92810823540db2b5cf24d33db5ef489c
Author: Bjoern Michaelsen <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 20 16:58:37 2014 +0000

    source-hash-3558f9c0592b443f20ca1f406198f89a5385767e

    commit 3558f9c0592b443f20ca1f406198f89a5385767e
    Author:     Julien Nabet <[email protected]>
    AuthorDate: Sun May 18 01:14:29 2014 +0200
    Commit:     Julien Nabet <[email protected]>
    CommitDate: Sun May 18 01:14:29 2014 +0200


Looks like it ought to be the below commit within that range.
Adding Cc: to [email protected]; Could you possibly take a look at this?
Thanks

(As the user doesn't readily have access to another source of entropy from
within Basic, the fact that doing Randomize twice near in time sets the seed to
the same value is rather surprising. If it's documented as doing that, a) AOO
doesn't do that in practice, and b) we should probably just change the
documentation)

commit df466d79cb126667cc9d5c108367bfa4f5ce76c8
Author: Thomas Arnhold <[email protected]>
Date:   Tue May 13 22:42:49 2014 +0200

    fdo#70474: Random number generation weak with Rnd in BASIC

    Just reuse the rng functionality. This improves the randomness.

    Initialize seed with system time if no argument for RANDOMIZE is given. As
the help text
    states: "If Number is omitted, the generator uses the current value of the
system timer".

    Change-Id: I5fa46e8344b2402dff66a8db2449d43e2ca27d6d
    Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/9349
    Reviewed-by: Thomas Arnhold <[email protected]>
    Tested-by: Thomas Arnhold <[email protected]>

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to