https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65982
Robinson Tryon (qubit) <qu...@runcibility.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |mst...@redhat.com,
| |qu...@runcibility.com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Whiteboard| |filter:odf
--- Comment #5 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) <qu...@runcibility.com> ---
(In reply to Roman Polach from comment #1)
> As described in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=75405#c9 for
> OpenOffice, there is undocumented flag UnxForceZeroExtLeading which can be
> hacked in a single file to false and then the problem should be gone.
OpenGrok does show that this string appears in various files, including
'xmlimp.cxx':
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/search?q=UnxForceZeroExtLeading&project=core&project=help&project=translations&defs=&refs=&path=&hist=
I just googled for that flag (by itself, as well as "~ + OASIS"), and grepped
through the ODF 1.2 OASIS spec, and it's not mentioned, so it does appear to be
something special to LO...
I don't see a mention here (or anywhere else on the TDF wiki), so perhaps
something as-yet undocumented:
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/ODF_Implementer_Notes/List_of_LibreOffice_ODF_Extensions
> But I do not know why such flag exists at all?
> And why it is true by default?
> (And why it is undocummented?)
> Is there any misbehavior when one set it to false?
Hopefully the process of documenting this behavior will answer some or all of
your q's!
(Undocumented behavior, so Status -> NEW)
[cc: mstahl]
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
