https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=89242
Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #7 from Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> --- Version: 4.5.0.0.alpha0+ Build ID: 09f83e1f409853a6c6e4300287c4e50bad5b9d0b Locale: fr_ OSX 10.10.2 I can't reproduce the problem when the CMU fonts are not installed. When I open the document, the first line is in bold, the second line, normal weight. So, when the fonts are not installed, the fallback correctly substitutes that font for a bold weight. After I install the CMU fonts, the document *appears to be* incorrectly displayed. The first line no longer appears bold, however, if you select the word "bold" and remove the bold attribute, then you will notice a difference in display. So, it is not that the bold attribute isn't registered/displayed, just that the weight of CMU Serif is not sufficiently distinguished between BOLD/NON-BOLD. Whether this is down to our incomplete core text support for all font weights of a given family, the font itself, or some other problem linked to LO font handling, I have no idea, but it very much falls within the category of other True/Opentype font weight support issues that one sees in numerous font bugs with LibreOffice on OSX. Confirming -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
