https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90801
--- Comment #10 from Yury <yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Jay Philips from comment #9) > (In reply to Yury from comment #7) ... > Well as stated by Adolfo, it was a decision that the UX team had taken in > 2012 and hadnt been implemented. Well the change is an attempt to clean up > the options dialog which is quite complicated. It will remain complicated, even with this option gone. What would you expect to be there -- one checkbox? :) Summing up, there was a convenient feature, now it'll be gone. But what's one more inconvenience? What really would benefit from simplification is fonts' processing. I've browsed the respective part of the LO source a couple of years ago -- wanting to (1) know why raster fonts are not allowed (on linux) to be used as UI font in LO, and to (2) know why font lists in styles have no influence on glyph substitution. And I couldn't make heads nor tails of it. I bet developers are afraid of touching this code, either. :) If you have some say in it, Jay, please, kindly have a look into the (closed/notourproblem) #56076. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
