https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92256
Eike Rathke <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #3 from Eike Rathke <[email protected]> --- Well, the two sheet separators are different and referencing 3D blocks is different notation between Excel and OOo/LibO, additionally Excel knows the R1C1 reference syntax. Old OOo tried both sheet separators and 3D notations and whatever seemed resolvable was taken, this was successful in many cases but failed miserably in other cases. These two addressing schemes really should not be mixed in the same document. We could only reimplement part of the "if the configured syntax fails try the other" with the error margin that maybe if detection then resolves a string that in fact should not had been resolved you're out of luck and get wrong values instead of error or other undefined behaviour. Doesn't sound very appealing to me.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
