https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92655
--- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Joel Madero from comment #8) > Why is it needsDevEval? It's new - and it's not an easy hack - what else is > there to evaluate? Is anyone but a developer (hopefully Frank's "ideal developer" as on page 21 of the treatise) comfortable with the underlying code? I worked several of the examples and find no flaw with Frank's argument for needed improvements. > NEW implied that someone confirmed all 10 of the issues > listed already. No, it is NEW because there is no question that when accepted as an enhancement it is--while perhaps over ambitious in scope--all valid enhancement to LibreOffice. And so is deserving of developer review and comment, in any case Frank's write up is an enjoyable read. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
