https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92711
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Monastirsky <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Balaco from comment #5) > looking at bug 71625 Maxim pointed at Well, that was not me but m.a.riosv, although I do agree that it's probably the same bug. > - the report of #71625 was not (initially, at least) clear, with steps to > reproduce the problem; I tried to make a report with this quality, and I can > improve it if you think it should Your effort to make good bug reports is much appreciated, and I wish everyone will follow you, but that doesn't matter anymore after the bug was identified as already fixed (given that it's indeed the same bug, and that it's indeed fixed in later versions). > - the major version I use is the same, so bug reports should be accepted; > office programs are thing that should not be expected to be updated with > much frequency The Document Foundation (in whose BugZilla we're talking right now) has a clear release schedule of monthly releases, whether you like it or not: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleasePlan It clearly states what versions are EOL, thus unsupported anymore by TDF. Of course, downstream users such as Linux distros, are free to not follow this schedule, but then it's solely their responsibility to fix bugs in the software they're shipping. If your distro version is still supported, you should ask the distro maintainers for support, not the TDF. > - this bug (and at least a couple of the other duplicates) are marked as > solved, but I can't find an impossible information: what is the first > version of LO that this bug was fixed? There is a field named "Whiteboard", where these versions are listed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
