https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83373
--- Comment #14 from romain <[email protected]> --- == For the context == I prefer put my comment in this Bug (because of a bigger history) than in mine (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=92867) which actually seems to be a duplicate. (I would agree if you do it but don't do it myself, because I do not know the architecture of the software). == Remark == What I understand from outside is, that it seems there is something like a window template/container whose width is given by the templatedWindow/content. _ Fine: let's avoid developing twice the same thing Some of the windows are defining there opening width dynamically (in this bug, using the previous inputed string / in my bug, using the max string size of all elements of the selected column) _ Fine: let's give some freedom to the customisation _ What is here missing are some borders into the template/container _____ As a regular SW tester I see the possible problems which could come from this fix and want to give them here, in the form of specifications (based on what I would expect) - please consider, I am ONE (not all the other users) and my perception is perhaps false or GNOME oriented (I don't know -and care- about the other UIs): I will use: - size to avoid writing twice for width and height - template for the container or the template (I don't know how it works) - final window for the customized window based on the template or into the container 1/ The wished size must be defined by the final window 2/ The application adequate size must be the limitation to the application width of the wished size(computed at the template level) 3/ The probable size must be the limitation to a minimum readable size (given by the final window) 4/ The size is a limitation of the probable size to the desktop (or current screen?) size at the template level ==> the check 3 will make me happy because I often split vertically a screen with 2 applications and I don't want to have really unreadable windows because of that ==> the check 4 is just because I am a fan of "belt and suspenders" solutions and as library provider never trust my users :D -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
