https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93596
Joel Madero <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Resolution|WONTFIX |INVALID --- Comment #9 from Joel Madero <[email protected]> --- Seriously - please get over it. I am putting this back to INVALID - if you change it again you will be banned from bugzilla for 24 hours per https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Policies_and_Procedures The pertinent part being: "Attacking QA staff for their decision of priority/status - friendly conversations are welcome but attacks are not" It makes literally no difference - whether it's WONTFIX or INVALID other than for your ego. On our side, QA side, who has dedicated tens of thousands of hours to provide a product at no cost, the objectively right criteria is INVALID because it works as designed. Again - this is first warning, next will be a ban. To save everyone time, you've already said you're going to tell your client to use another product, that's fine, you are free to do so and you are free to use another product yourself. Please stop whining about a disagreement - either get involved as a contributor - or accept the verdict of our experienced QA members. Those are the options. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
