https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94957
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |[email protected], | |[email protected], | |[email protected], | |[email protected] Ever confirmed|0 |1 Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #1 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> --- Well, sure, it is reasonable to check on adding CLI Unicode support to the Math - formula editor, and its "experimental" visual mode--so a new enhancement. But as its GUI font support is already quite far removed from the other modules, it is unlikely to be achieved in the Math formula editor as was just done elsewhere. Presently, using the "Fonts" dialog (Format -> Fonts)--Font families are explicitly defined for use in Formulas as variables/functions/numbers/text, and as a list of alternative fonts in the Custom stanzas for use with embedded FONT switches in the Math Commands window. Glyphs from any font family can be inserted into any location in the command windows or in the visual editor by GUI using the "Symbols" dialog (Tools -> Catalog) and selecting by GUI from the defined symbol sets. Beyond default greek/igree/special symbol sets, one can define their own. Or any existing assignment can be changed. New "additions" to support undefined MathML 2.0 elements can be made in the same GUI dialog. Point is, IIUC a CLI insertion for a Math Formula must provide additional structure about the glyph beyond what was just implemented to be of use here. In a sense doing it duplicates much of the work that bug 32418 would require. @Frédéric, JBF, Regina... any thoughts on utility and a priority of pursuing either? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
