https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=93896

Yousuf (Jay) Philips <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|REOPENED                    |NEEDINFO

--- Comment #6 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips <[email protected]> ---
Works fine for me.

Version: 5.1.0.0.alpha1+
Build ID: b684090d4f573eb339e93872d0cef07e69adc913
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@70-TDF, Branch:master, Time:
2015-10-16_01:50:06
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)

Version: 5.0.4.0.0+
Build ID: 9a75c72495ed6014d6c84fdead14bef68ea32858
TinderBox: Linux-rpm_deb-x86_64@46-TDF, Branch:libreoffice-5-0, Time:
2015-10-16_08:36:43
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)

(In reply to tommy27 from comment #5)
> has anyone tried to bibisect this latest 5.0.x regressions?

I doubt there is any regression there.

(In reply to Simo Kaupinmäki from comment #3)
> So, the issue seemed fixed in 5.0.3.0, but now it has re-emerged in 5.0.3.1.
> As I already saw the same regression occur between 5.0.0.0.beta1 and
> 5.0.0.5, it seems something goes wrong when the beta version is turned into
> a release candidate.

Works fine for me. Could it be specific to Finnish, as i've been typing english
words into the document before saving it to RTF? Can you please provide a
sample corrupt RTF, so we can test if it is corrupt when we open it?

Version: 5.0.3.1
Build ID: fd8cfc22f7f58033351fcb8a83b92acbadb0749e
Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to