https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94437
--- Comment #9 from Oliver Specht <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Svante Schubert from comment #7) > > Olivers assumption was that the existing index is an automated generated > one, which should be marked as auto generated so can be removed when > exchanged by user. Not the index is auto generated but the index entries! > > Two question: > 1) What makes Oliver think the index is auto generated? The attached concordance file makes me think that. > 2) Why should an existing auto generated index be removed, but an existing > user index be kept? As above: Not the index but the entries are removed when a new index is created. That's the idea behind the concordance file. > > > Wouldn't in general showing existing indexs and the choice of removal a more > flexible solution? The idea of using a concordance file is to make sure the usually used technical/scientific/... terms are marked automatically so that you don't need to do the work manually for each document you create. While editing the document some of the related text might be removed others might be added so it makes sense to create the automatic index entries again. To do that you need to know which of the index entries were automatically created - otherwise you would also delete manually created entries. To make a long story short: The standard is missing a feature that has been introduced in Writer before it became open source. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
