https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=96679
Joel Madero <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|[email protected] | --- Comment #6 from Joel Madero <[email protected]> --- Fair enough - I pointed to this bug from the other bug report and they can add what they want. Anyways, I'm done proposing enhancements for UI/UX - I don't understand the philosophy. Generally speaking before QA had a VERY low bar for enhancement requests - basically the principle was: 1) Would it help some users; 2) Would it hurt the project in some way; We tried to actively engage with users to encourage them to give ideas - to flush those ideas out, and to explain that many enhancements will never be implemented (they depend on someone actually caring enough to implement) but that we're happy to leave them open in case someone does find them interesting enough to implement. Now, it appears like UX has some golden key to some secret room with little (if any) guide as to what is allowed in and what isn't. This proposal met the above criteria (some users would find it useful, having a few extra keyboard shortcuts available as an *option* surely wouldn't impact anyone else's work) yet it was rejected based on "well they could do it another way" or "they *should* use styles" Anyways, I'm no fan of this method of a few "insiders" having some arbitrary way of closing enhancement requests so I'll stop reporting them. Thanks for taking the time to close this one as WFM. P.S. The idea wasn't to set more as default - it was to allow users to add them themselves in the keyboard shortcuts options. Removing myself from CC - no need to explain anything to me. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
