https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95861
--- Comment #3 from David Tardon <[email protected]> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #2) > @David T., * > > >Should libreoffice even aspire to be an HTML editor? > > It is not an aspiration, rather seeking to restore that capability. But do we want to restore that capability? Does libreoffice need an internal HTML editor? (Note I am not talking about HTML import/export.) > The HTML Web component remains implemented--and its "source view" mode was a > pretty convenient WYSIWYG editor for HTML 4 and inline style I believe back > to StarOffice era. > > Are you suggesting we strip it all out and concentrate on XLST export only? I suggest we strip the whole Web module out. The HTML import/export should stay. (As C++ code--XSLT is IMHO completely unsuitable for the heavy processing that is needed to convert ODF to HTML.) > > While that is probably valid, I'd like to think there is still a need for > visual HTML 5 markup with inline CSS3 and presenting that markup as WYSIWYG. I don't disagree with that. What I disagree with is the need to have that HTML 5 WYSIWYG editor inside LibreOffice. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
