https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97086
Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |jmadero....@gmail.com
Summary|Encrypting xlsx file with |Encryption as XLSX
|password |truncates password to 15
| |characters
Severity|critical |major
--- Comment #3 from Joel Madero <jmadero....@gmail.com> ---
This should be checked to find out if it's a regression. Also, sorry for the
noise but I'm lowering to Major.
Reason: Critical really should be kept for the worst bugs that affect the
project. Worst means, serious data loss/crashes for a *significant portion of
our user base.*" Although this might lock out data - this would be in
incredibly rare cases....when? Well: (1) when a user password protects which is
already in a very small minority of our user base; and then (2) when that
password is >15 characters long; and finally (3) when the user isn't aware of
this limitation. A relatively fast search of the bugs will come up with this
hit....if it's not a regression, proof of how rare it is comes with the fact
that it has never been reported before :)
By default critical and major bugs go to "high" but I'm leaving as "medium" due
to the above rationale - the very small number of potentially affected users
means lower priority in an objective standard.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
