https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47778
Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC| |LibreOffice@bielefeldundbus | |s.de Ever Confirmed|0 |1 See Also| |https://issues.apache.org/o | |oo/show_bug.cgi?id=57432 Version|LibO 3.5.0 Release |LibO 3.3.0 Beta2 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> 2012-05-11 08:06:25 PDT --- [Reproducible] with attached Sample and "LibreOffice 3.5.3.2 (RC2) German UI/Locale [Build-ID: 235ab8a-3802056-4a8fed3-2d66ea8-e241b80] on German WIN7 Home Premium (64bit) In sample in yellow Area the contents of A1:B3 is shown. Steps to reproduce: 1. Select B1:B2 2. Click "Merge Cells" Icon and merge without shifting contents of hidden cell > Double width cell visible with contents "11", no changes in yellow "show contents" area 3. Click B1 4. Fill down using fill handle until B3 Expected: B1,B2,B3 containing 1,2,3, merge remains Actual: As Expected, see H1:H3 5. Click A1 6. Fill down using fill handle until A3 Expected: A1,A2,A3 containing 1,2,3, merge remains Actual: Cell Contents as expected, but merge destroyed I never saw that working in a different way, already the same in OOo 1.1.4 (so "inherited"), but to me the current behavior seems inconsistent. I disagree with proposed solution in AOOo Bugzilla, in example but I simply want to see the same behavior in columns A and B and that merged cells keep merged. But may be there are ODF dependencies or similar? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
