https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98349

V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|UNCONFIRMED                 |NEEDINFO
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1

--- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
Sorry, can not confirm.

Obtained and installed a set of Chess Leipzig from
http://www.enpassant.dk/chess/fonteng.htm

Reviewed in BableMap and TypeLight and the font is treated as a "Symbol Font"
with Unicode points in the Private Use Area U+F020-F07F block. The font defines
mapping of most to corresponding U+0020-007F for Basic Latin ASCII keyboard
entry.

Checked LO 4.4 -> 5.1 and we handle the Chess Leipzig --"Symbol Font"--
composition correctly. Mapping of the Private Use Area Unicode to appropriate
default Basic Latin ASCII keys behaves correctly and can not reproduce
incorrect font substitution.  

On Windows 10 Pro 64-bit en-US with current
Version: 5.1.1.2 (x64)
Build ID: fe4d9e69c82c6ee6db3c27cd5e2d47558afa80ac
CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; 
Locale: en-US (en_US)

nor with

Version: 5.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 817f6bd75e98a321c238b5906bfcb031908914b2
CPU Threads: 8; OS Version: Windows 6.19; UI Render: GL; 
TinderBox: Win-x86@39, Branch:master, Time: 2016-03-01_01:14:57
Locale: en-US (en_US)

Entry of the board row numbers and column letters responds correctly to
U+<CodePoint> conversion with <Alt>+X, as do the additional white pieces (font
glyphs 90 - 95).

Printing to PDF, and Export to PDF handle the "Symbol Font" mappings correctly.

Sorry but this seems to all be behaving correctly.  Do things improve if you
repair your user profile?  

https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/UserProfile

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to