https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98596
--- Comment #2 from Grega Bremec <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from comment #1) > (In reply to Grega Bremec from comment #0) > > If I type in the actual adornment manually (like, "45 Light"), the font is > > found (i.e. the message under the input box no longer says "the closest > > matching style will be used", but rather that the "same font will be used > > for print and screen"), but is never used in the document. > > I don't have Helvetica installed here -- can you reproduce the problem with > any fonts that ship with LibreOffice/your base system? Unfortunately not. There are some TTFs with such style specification: /usr/share/fonts/open-sans/OpenSans-ExtraBold.ttf: Open Sans,Open Sans Extrabold:style=Extrabold,Regular ...but in those, for some reason, the second name component is used, and not the first one as is in the case of OTF (not an expert here, but I'd understand if this naming inconsistency was a FC-related thing, too). So for OpenSans TTF family, I get four distinct fonts. Not for Helvetica Neue LT Pro OTF family - there is just one font for this one. The trick is, I can see by looking at styles.xml of my old templates, that the second name component was used from OTF too, judging from meta.xml, in LibreOffice/4.2.5.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
