https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95061
--- Comment #8 from Joel Madero <[email protected]> --- (In reply to David McCracken from comment #7) > I don't understand how you could consider this a minor bug, considering that > it makes animation worthless and it is a problem that does not exist in > earlier versions of the code base or in the current version of Open Office. > I thought that Libre would be a better choice than Open, as it has more > frequent updates but if updates only break existing functionality then Libre > is itself worthless. It pains me to say this to developers who are working > for the public good but if what you do is bad who benefits? It literally makes no difference for when the bug is fixed. It's an objective categorization, if a developer (volunteer, we don't control them, we don't dictate what gets fixed) wants to fix it, they'll fix it. A good chunk of users fail to understand this and many scream and yell about how their pet bug is "the one" . . . the options are always the same: 1) Fix it yourself; 2) Pay for a fix through a certified developer; 3) find a friend, family member, etc... to fix it (I suggest treating them to a nice meal if they do) 4) Wait patiently There are no other options. If you want to help you can test older versions and see if it ever worked in LibreOffice, if it did, we can do additional things to move it along. http://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
