https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99999
V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC| |[email protected]
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from V Stuart Foote <[email protected]> ---
Believe this is a simple mistagging issue with the original WordNet 2.1
definitions file, th_en_US_new.dat from 2005, used for the HunSpell projects
thesaurus MyThes--so not really a bug, just incorrectly formatted data.
We then tweak that listing a bit and end up with:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/tree/en/th_en_US_v2.dat
In a LibreOffice Writer session , if you look at "normal" rather than
"normally", where the entries are correctly tagged, you'll see what is supposed
to be shown. Antonyms are not displayed on the context menu. And shifting into
the Thesaurus with <ctrl>+F7 you'll see the full record including the type
annotation.
As to adding a separate LibreOffice context menu for antonyms--I don't think
that would be of much value as there are just too few formally defined to make
it worth while.
I believe coverage in WordNet 3/3.1 is better, but looks like the data format
changed quite a bit so the processing scripts (Daniel N.'s wn2ooo) used for
MyThes would have to be refactored. Also, don't know if the licensing allows
needed MPL redistribution for use with HunSpell or Language Tools project(s).
=-ref-=
http://hunspell.github.io/
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/dictionaries/tree/en
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/external/mythes/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
