https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45260
Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OS/Version|Windows (All) |All Status|NEEDINFO |NEW Keywords| |NEEDINFO --- Comment #9 from Rainer Bielefeld <[email protected]> 2012-05-30 02:22:45 PDT --- Please never change NEW to NEEDINFO! <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA-FAQ#How_to_use_Status_or_Keyword_NEEDINFO> Again and again I stumble upon bugs where no bugfix progress is coming, seems because developers see NEEDINFO and think no action is required until status is back to NEW (may be because queries are used that sort out NEEDINFO bugs or whatever else). Of course there is some sense in "redirecting" a Bug from the direct bugfixing process to an additional QA loop for bibisect or similar, but before that is common sense, has been announced, added to the manuals and so on this ded-end-street-danger is too big. And BTW, I can reproduce the problem with LibO 3.5.3.2 on Ubuntu Linux 12 My Bibisect knowledge is not very up to date, I alos doubt that we really have Bibisect Versions between 3.5.0Beta0 and Beta1 (where the bug appeared due to Comment2)? It seems <https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Bibisect> is not up to date concerning available versions? And concerning <http://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/bibisect/>? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list [email protected] http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
