https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=98061

Terrence Enger <[email protected]> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|bibisectRequest             |bibisected
                 CC|                            |[email protected]

--- Comment #4 from Terrence Enger <[email protected]> ---
Removing keyword bibisectrequest; adding keyword bibisected.

Working in (an old and admittedly somewhat damaged version of) the
linux daily dbgutil bibisect repository, I have narrowed the first
appearance of this bug to the 72 commits between ...
    73f647e... 2015-10-22: source-hash-6e3c362...
and ...
    e52af3c... 2015-10-23: source-hash-c1d0074...

In this range, I notice ...

    commit 825b3df7f1d987021ec4a08ff8e7ed78e5772c97
    Author: Tomaž Vajngerl <[email protected]>
    Date:   Thu Oct 22 19:03:01 2015 +0200

        tdf#94138 fix printing of edit form fields

        There are 2 bugs:

        - In Window::GetDrawPixelFont we asked for the font to the
        current window, which didn't work correctly when printing. The
        device itself should provide the font and not the window.

        - In paint method the font wasn't setup correctly which should
        happen before painting by calling ApplySettings. The effect of
        this is that print preview didn't show the correct font for the
        edit control and similar when you copy + paste the edit control.
        The work around for this is to call ApplySettings again.

        Change-Id: I74960355823c71c1d5a18a82bbc86561a3c4b760

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to