https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101587
Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alex Thurgood <[email protected]> ---
@Alex : let's start with some questions
1) which python extension in the SDK ?
2) which version of python did the compilation pick up on (when you ran make) ?
3) can you start LO from the command line with the python extension included
and provide any output you see on the terminal ?
As a general point, from what I recall, the using the SDK on Mac for
development of extensions in languages other than StarBasic and C++ has always
been problematic (Java and Python being most notably the two main languages
posing a problem) :
- Java because of JNI instantiation into the threads of an LO process
(instantiation itself depend on JRE/JDK version, attempts to instantiate an AWT
process outside of the main LO thread, etc)
- Python because of the requirement that the python code be completely
executable from within the LO application environment (as far as I can
remember)
Setting to NEEDINFO
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
